Agenda and draft minutes

Licensing Sub-Committee (3) - Wednesday 5th July, 2017 1.00 pm

Venue: Room 3.1, 3rd Floor, 5 Strand, London, WC2 5HR. View directions

Contact: Jonathan Deacon  Email:  jdeacon@westminster.gov.uk Tel: 020 7641 2783

Items
No. Item

1.

Membership

To report any changes to the membership.

Minutes:

There were no changes to the Membership.

2.

Declarations of Interest

To receive declarations by Members and Officers of any personal or prejudicial interests in matters on this agenda.

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest.

3.

Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, W1 pdf icon PDF 1 MB

App

No

Ward / Cumulative Impact Area

Site Name and Address

Application

Licensing Reference Number

1.

West End Ward / not in cumulative impact area

Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, W1

New Premises Licence

17/03516/LIPN

 

 

 

 

Minutes:

LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEE No. 3

Wednesday 5th July 2017

 

Membership:              Councillor Melvyn Caplan (Chairman), Councillor Peter Freeman and Councillor Shamim Talukder

 

Legal Adviser:             Barry Panto

Policy Adviser:            Chris Wroe

Committee Officer:     Jonathan Deacon

Presenting Officer:     Heidi Lawrance

 

Relevant Representations:         Environmental Health, 1 Resident Association, 4 local residents and 2 Parochial Church Council All Saints Margaret Street (1 is also a local resident).

 

Present:  Mr Julian Skeens (Solicitor, Representing the Applicant), Mr Guy Ivesha (Director, Applicant Company), Mr Mikail Goek (Manager), Mr Richard Brown (Solicitor, Citizens Advice Bureau Licensing Advice Project, representing Fitzrovia Neighbourhood Association) and Mr Alan Moses (local resident).

 

Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, W1

15/03516/LIPN

 

1.

Late Night Refreshment (Indoors)

 

 

Monday to Sunday:                              23:00 to 01:30            

 

To members and their guests and at private pre-booked events.

 

To members of the public in the restaurant only until midnight on Monday to Saturday and 23.30 on Sundays

 

 

Amendments to application advised at hearing:

 

 

None.

 

 

 

Decision (including reasons if different from those set out in report):

 

 

This was an application for a new premises licence. The Applicant was proposing to locate a restaurant and ancillary bar on the ground floor of the property.  There would be office space occupying floors 1 to 4, a business lounge on floor 5 and an events space with bar on floor 6. The application sought to allow on-sales of alcohol and the provision of late night refreshment throughout the premises from 07:00 to 01:30 Monday to Sunday along with other regulated entertainment. 

 

The Sub-Committee had part heard the application at the meeting on 15 June.  The application had been adjourned to 5 July in order that the Applicant clarified certain matters, including updating proposed conditions.

 

The report for the current hearing included the Applicant’s conditions discussed with Environmental Health.  Mr Brown, representing Fitzrovia Neighbourhood Association, had provided some comments in response to the proposed conditions via e-mail prior to the hearing.  Mr Skeens began the hearing by responding in turn to Mr Brown’s points. 

 

Mr Brown had requested that the sale and supply of alcohol should be ancillary to a substantial table meal in keeping with the Council’s model restaurant condition 66, and that any bar use should be restricted to those waiting to dine or those having dined.  Mr Skeens stated that the Applicant was seeking flexibility for those who do not want a table meal.  The Applicant had originally intended purely having a hatched area for those who did not have a table meal.  Environmental Health had recommended having a maximum capacity for this area and 40 was proposed by the Applicant.

 

Mr Brown sought clarification as to why ‘after 23:00’ had been chosen as the time when patrons would no longer be permitted to take drinks or glass containers with them when temporarily leaving the premises.  At the previous hearing there had been a comparable proposed condition when it was not permitted at any time.  Mr Skeens responded that there had been a proposed condition at the initial hearing that ‘there shall  ...  view the full minutes text for item 3.