Minutes:
WCC LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEE NO. 2
(“The Committee”)
Thursday 29 September 2022 – Item 3
Membership: Councillor Angela Piddock (Chairman) Councillor Judith Southern and Councillor Caroline Sargent
Officer Support: Legal Adviser: Steve Burnett
Policy Officer: Aaron Hardy
Committee Officer: Sarah Craddock
Presenting Officer: Jessica Donovan
Other Parties: Mr Juan Mosqueda (Applicant),
Roxsana Haq (Licensing Authority) and
Anil Drayan (Environmental Health Service)
Application for a New Premises Licence in respect of Pokehouse, Basement And Ground Floor, 13 New Row, London WC2N 4LF- 22/06963/LIPN
Full Decision
Premises
Pokehouse
Basement and Ground Floor
13 New Row
London WC2N 4LF
Applicant
Double Seven Hospitality Ltd
Ward
St James’s
Cumulative Impact Area
West End
Special Consideration Zone
N/A
Activities and Hours applied for
Recorded Music
Mondays to Sundays 11.00 to 21.00
Sale of Alcohol
Monday to Sunday 11.00 to 21;00
The Opening Hours of the Premises:
Monday to Sunday 11.00 to 21;00
Summary of Application
This is an application for a New Premises Licence under the Licensing Act 2003 (“The Act”). The premises currently operates as a quick service restaurant providing poke bowls and drinks.
The application is to permit the Premises to trade Mondays to Sundays 11.00 until 21.00.
The Premises are located in St James’s Ward and is in the West End Cumulative Impact Area.
There is a resident count of 132
Representations received
The Metropolitan Police Service (PC Dave Morgan) - Withdrawn
Environmental Health Service (Anil Drayan)
Licensing Authority (Roxsana Haq)
Covent Garden Community Association (not in attendance)
One resident (not in attendance)
Summary of issues raised by the objectors
The thrust of the objections cites public nuisance and crime and disorder.
Licensing Authority Stated:
The Licensing Authority has concerns in relation to this application and how the premises would promote the Licensing Objectives:
• Prevention of Public Nuisance
• Prevention of Crime & Disorder
• Public Safety
• Protection of Children from harm
EHS stated:
The Premises are located in the West End Cumulative Impact Zone. Representations made against the application as it may adversely impact on the licensing objectives of Public Nuisance and Public Safety.
The applicant has not offered sufficient conditions, the plans are unclear, no capacity has been provided and subsequent sanitary accommodations. In addition, Environmental Health also wish to assess cooking ventilation scheme to prevent odour nuisance.
The Residents Association stated:
· The CGCA is concerned that if granted as applied for this will fail to support the Licensing Objectives, particularly relating to Public Nuisance.
· Request a condition be added:
No noise generated on the premises, or by its associated plant or equipment, shall emanate from the premises nor vibration be transmitted through the structure of the premises which gives rise to a nuisance.
The Resident states:
· The premises illegally sell alcohol, the manager is rude and they block residential doors and play loud music.
Policy Position
HRS1
· Applications within the core hours set out below in this policy will
generally, be granted for the relevant premises uses, subject to not
being contrary to other policies in the Statement of Licensing Policy.
The demonstration of compliance in the requirements of policies CD1, PS1, PN1 and CH1 associated with the likelihood of the effect of the grant of a licence for later or earlier hours on crime and disorder, public safety, public nuisance and the protection of children from harm.
CIP1(A)
It is the Licensing Authority’s policy to refuse applications within
the West End Cumulative Impact Zone for: pubs and bars, fast food premises,
and music and dancing and similar entertainment.
RNT1
B. Applications inside the West End Cumulative Impact Zone will
generally be granted subject to:
1. The application meeting the requirements of policies CD1, PS1,
PN1 and CH1.
2. The hours for licensable activities are within the council’s Core
Hours Policy HRS1.
3. The operation of any delivery services for alcohol and/or latenight
refreshment meeting the council’s Ancillary Delivery of Alcohol
and/or Late-Night Refreshment Policy DEL1.
4. The applicant has demonstrated that they will not add to
cumulative impact within the Cumulative Impact Zone.
5. The application and operation of the venue meeting the definition
of a restaurant.
SUBMISSIONS AND REASONS
1. Ms Jessica Donovan outlined the application to the Committee. She advised that representations had been received from the Environmental Health Service, the Licensing Authority, the Covent Garden Community Association and one local resident. She further advised that the Metropolitan Police Force had withdrawn their representation as conditions had been agreed with the Applicant.
2. The Committee noted that the Premises was located within the St James’s Ward and in the West End Cumulative Impact Area. Ms Donovan confirmed that the additional submissions from the Covent Garden Community Association had been circulated to the Committee.
4. Mr Mosqueda advised that conditions had been agreed with the Responsible Authorities and highlighted that there was CCTV in operation in the restaurant. He confirmed that there was no cooking, except for rice, carried out in the kitchen so there would be no cooking smells or smoke emitted from the Premises. He stated that he had made several attempts to contact his neighbours who had made complaints about the restaurant, however he had received no response but the residents have his email address and mobile phone number.
5. Mr Mosqueda further confirmed that he had no intention of operating the business beyond 21:00 hours, the capacity for the Premises was 60 persons and they sold approximately 150 covers per day.
6. Mr Anil Drayan on behalf of the Environmental Health Service (EH) stated that EH had maintained their representation as the Premises was in the West End Cumulative Impact Area and to assist the Committee should they have any questions regarding the conditions which had been agreed with the Responsible Authorities. He confirmed that there was no cooking, other than rice, carried out on the Premises and that they had been unable to verify the complaints received from the Applicant’s neighbours.
7. Mr Drayan confirmed that the EH and the Applicant had discussed the application in detail and the Applicant was aware that he needed to turn off his sound system on the closing of the Premises. He highlighted that the operating hours were well within the Council’s Core Hours Policy and that EH were satisfied with the application and happy to withdraw their representation as all the proposed conditions had been agreed.
8. In response to questions from the Committee, Mr Drayan advised that the Premises was located next to the White Swan pub. He confirmed that the Premises had not been selling alcohol without a Premises Licence and that he had evidence from the City Inspectors to confirm this.
9. Mr Drayan explained that when EH had visited the Premises they had discovered that the Applicant was selling can drinks that contained 0.5% alcohol which they were allowed to sell without a Premises Licence.
10.He advised the Committee that the Applicant was now clear that if any of the conditions were breached the Council had the power to Review the Premises Licence.
11.Ms Haq on behalf of the Licensing Authority confirmed to the Committee that they were satisfied with the agreed conditions, and this had allayed the Licensing Authorities concerns.
Decision
12.The Committee has determined an application for a grant of a new Premises Licence under the Licensing Act 2003. The Committee is aware that it has a duty to consider each application on its individual merits and did so when determining this application.
13.In reaching their decision, the Committee took into account all the committee papers, supplementary submissions made by the Applicant, and the oral evidence given by all parties during the hearing.
14.The Committee was satisfied that, in accordance with the Licensing Act 2003, Home Office Guidance, Westminster’s Statement of Licensing Policy and on the evidence before it, it was appropriate and proportionate, in all the circumstances, to GRANT the application.
15.In reaching its decision, the Committee took into consideration that the Applicant had agreed conditions with the CGCA, Responsible Authorities and that the Metropolitan Police Force.
16.The Committee was persuaded by the arguments advanced by the Applicant that they were a responsible operator and that they had provided valid reasons as to why the granting of the application would not undermine the licensing objectives. The Committee noted that the Premises was closing at 21:00 hours so the Premises would be operating well within the Council’s Core Hours Policy and that this was an exceptional reason why the Committee could depart from Westminster’s Cumulative Impact Policy.
17.In reaching its decision, the Committee concluded that the conditions attached to the licence would alleviate the residents’ concerns and were appropriate and proportionate and would promote the licencing objective.
18. Having carefully considered the committee papers and the submissions made by all of the parties, both orally and in writing, the Committee has decided, after taking into account all of the individual circumstances of this case and the promotion of the four licensing objectives: -
a) To refuse permission for the Provision of Recorded Music.
b) To grant permission for the Sale of alcohol Monday to Sunday 11:00 until 21:00.
c) To grant permission for the opening hours of the Premise Monday to Sunday 11:00 until 21:00.
d) The new premises licence shall be subject to any relevant mandatory conditions.
e) The new premises licence is subject to the following agreed conditions imposed by the Committee which are considered appropriate and proportionate to promote the licensing objectives.
Conditions consistent with the operating schedule
(a) all crimes reported to the venue
(b) all ejections of patrons
(c) any complaints received concerning crime and disorder
(d) any incidents of disorder
(e) all seizures of drugs or offensive weapons
(f) any faults in the CCTV system, searching equipment or scanning equipment
(g) any visit by a relevant authority or emergency service.
o Induction training must be completed and documented prior to the delivery of alcohol by the rider.
o Refresher/reinforcement training must be completed and documented at intervals of no more than 6 months.
o Training records shall be available for inspection by a Police Officer or other authorised officer on request. Training records shall be electronically stored by the licence holder for a period of 12 months.
· details of the time and date the refusal was made.
· the identity of the delivery personnel refusing the sale.
· details of the alcohol the person attempted to purchase.
This is the Full Decision of the Licensing Sub-Committee which takes effect forthwith.
The Licensing Sub-Committee
29 September 2022
Supporting documents: