Agenda item

Internal alterations, re-modelling of basement rear extension, enlarged window from basement to garden, alterations to rear garden, balcony to ground floor rear over basement extension.

 

Additional representations were received from resident (01.03.23), (01.03.23), (28.02.23), (28.02.23), (04.07.23) and (05.07.23) and a resident (19.12.22) and (06.01.23)

 

Late representations were received from Barton Enginees (Unknown) and (Unknown), resident (11.07.23), (09.07.23), (07.07.23) (04.07.23), (05.01.23) and (06.01.23) and resident (09.11.23) Councillor Max Sullivan (06.01.23) and (11.07.23)

 

The Presenting Officer tabled the following revisions to the Drawings

 

Item No. 4: 23 Sutherland Place

 

Revised drawings / information from applicant

 

Revised drawings have been received since report publication to address some of

the final points made by objectors, and to correct some discrepancies or minor

refinements to the proposals as found by officers. These drawings are numbered as

below and replace their preceding versions as previously set out in the report.

01.11 Rev.B – Demo Rear Elevation

02.01 Rev.B – Proposed Basement Plan

02.02 Rev.B – Proposed Ground Floor Plan

02.06 Rev.B – Proposed Section A

02.08 Rev.B – Proposed Section D

02.09 Rev.B – Proposed Section E

02.11 Rev.B – Proposed Rear Elevation

 

These revisions can be summarised as below.

 

• Clarification of extent of lower-ground floor surface to be lowered (to correlate

with submitted demo plans)

 

• Minor corrections to how the rear sash and side closet wing windows are

shown in the drawings

 

• Existing stone sill to rear window reused and lowered for the new French

Doors

 

The applicant’s Conservation Engineer has also submitted a brief response to some

of the final points raised by objectors, as well as a Structural Statement

 

Simon Moxey addressed the committee in support of the application.

 

Martin Lugg addressed the committee in objection to the application.

 

RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY

 

1.  That Conditional Permission be granted.

 

2.  That Conditional Listed Building Consent be granted.

 

3.  That reasons for granting conditional listed building consent as set out in      Informative 1 of the draft decision notice be agreed.

 

basement to garden, alterations to rear garden, balcony to ground floor rear over basement extension.

 

Additional representations were received from resident (01.03.23), (01.03.23), (28.02.23), (28.02.23), (04.07.23) and (05.07.23) and a resident (19.12.22) and (06.01.23)

 

Late representations were received from Barton Enginees (Unknown) and (Unknown), resident (11.07.23), (09.07.23), (07.07.23) (04.07.23), (05.01.23) and (06.01.23) and resident (09.11.23) Councillor Max Sullivan (06.01.23) and (11.07.23)

 

The Presenting Officer tabled the following revisions to the Drawings

 

Item No. 4: 23 Sutherland Place

 

Revised drawings / information from applicant

 

Revised drawings have been received since report publication to address some of

the final points made by objectors, and to correct some discrepancies or minor

refinements to the proposals as found by officers. These drawings are numbered as

below and replace their preceding versions as previously set out in the report.

01.11 Rev.B – Demo Rear Elevation

02.01 Rev.B – Proposed Basement Plan

02.02 Rev.B – Proposed Ground Floor Plan

02.06 Rev.B – Proposed Section A

02.08 Rev.B – Proposed Section D

02.09 Rev.B – Proposed Section E

02.11 Rev.B – Proposed Rear Elevation

 

These revisions can be summarised as below.

 

• Clarification of extent of lower-ground floor surface to be lowered (to correlate

with submitted demo plans)

 

• Minor corrections to how the rear sash and side closet wing windows are

shown in the drawings

 

• Existing stone sill to rear window reused and lowered for the new French

Doors

 

The applicant’s Conservation Engineer has also submitted a brief response to some

of the final points raised by objectors, as well as a Structural Statement

 

Simon Moxey addressed the committee in support of the application.

 

Martin Lugg addressed the committee in objection to the application.

 

RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY

 

1.     That Conditional Permission be granted.

 

2.     That Conditional Listed Building Consent be granted.

 

3.     That reasons for granting conditional listed building consent as set out in Informative 1 of the draft decision notice be agreed.