Use the below search options at the bottom of the page to find information regarding recent decisions that have been taken by the council’s decision making bodies.
Alternatively you can visit the officer decisions page for information on officer delegated decisions that have been taken by council officers.
Establishment of the estate and property management arrangements for the management of Beachcroft.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 01/09/2020
Effective from: 09/09/2020
Decision:
a) To award a contract extension to GCH (Alan Morkill House) Ltd, for the provision of Beachcroft Care Home from 17th Dec 2020 to 17th June 2021.
b) To allow the GCH (Alan Morkill House) Ltd to mobilise Beachcroft House Care Home and undertake the transition of services from Carlton Dene and Westmead to Beachcroft House Care Home.
2) That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration gave approval to grant a lease to GCH (Alan Morkill House) Ltd for a period of 9 months from September 2020 to June 2021.
1) The fundamental reason for granting a lease to occupy Beachcroft and offer a 6-month extension to the current interim contract to GCH (Alan Morkill House) Limited was to ensure and secure immediate continuity of essential services to vulnerable residents currently living within Carlton Dene and Westmead and their move in to Beachcroft. The Care Quality Commission also required the care provider to evidence that it held a lease that allowed it to provide care on the premises or it would not pass registration and not be able to open. The contract extension also allowed time to procure the longer-term care provider.
2) The Council had a clear duty around service provision under the Care Act 2014:
· The Council has a duty to carry out an assessment of anyone who appears to require care and provide or organise support as required.
3) There were also several key national and local drivers informing the need for ongoing service provision, including:
· Prime Minister’s Challenge on Dementia 2020.
· England’s National Dementia Strategy.
· Bi Borough Health and Well Being Board Dementia Plan.
· The Council’s future plans for the commissioning and provision of high-quality and excellent residential care for our residents;
· City for All.
4) The 6-month contract extension to 17th June 2021 would enable the Council the time required to fully and properly procure a long-term provider to undertake care at Beachcroft House. Ensuring that the procurement exercise makes the most of national, regional and local best practice in full and open engagement with market, this would enable an effective and value for money public procurement exercise to be undertaken.
Cabinet Member approval sought for part two of the Outline Business Case.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 27/08/2020
Effective from: 05/09/2020
Decision:
Summary of Decision
1. That appendices A and B of this report be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972, Schedule 12A, Part 1, paragraph 3 (as amended) in that they contain information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).
2. The Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration:
2.1Approved a “partnership - style” delivery route;
2.2Approved the investigation of the proposed mitigation methods for reducing the Housing Revenue Account (HRA) affordability gap of the current scheme; and delegated authority to the Executive Director of Growth Planning and Housing and Finance to approve the implementation of the mitigations once they result in a viable scheme; the proposed mitigations being:
· Reviewing the housing tenure ratio;
· Reviewing the design detail to achieve best value for money;
· Investigating the potential for additional Community Infrastructure Levy funding;
2.3 Approved the contract between the Council and the contractor to be varied to allow for the release of the sum as set out in the report to cover the cost of delivering the remaining contracted multi-disciplinary services.
2.4 Approved the release of the budget as specified within Appendix A of the report to spend on void secure costs.
Reasons for Decision
The decisions as set out above haves been reached following a detailed delivery options appraisal process.
Wards affected: Church Street;
Extension of Waste Collection and Street
Cleansing Contract with Veolia ES Ltd. from September 2020 to
September 2024
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 25/08/2020
Effective from: 03/09/2020
Decision:
1. That this report be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972, Schedule 12A Part 1, paragraph 3 (as amended), in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).
2.
That the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways
and the Cabinet Member for Finance and Regeneration approved the
extension of the Waste and Recycling Collection, Street Cleansing
and Ancillary Services Contract with the organisation as set out in
the report. for one year from 16th September 2020 to
15th September 2021.
3. That the Cabinet Member for Environment & City Management and the Cabinet Member for Finance and Regeneration approved the continuation of the Food Waste and Recycling Processing contracts with the organisation as set out in the report. to be coterminous with the main contract to 15th September 2021.
Reasons for Decision
The scale of change to both how waste services operate and are funded from 2023 requires a new strategic approach to future waste management in Westminster. The social and economic impact of the coronavirus pandemic on Westminster and its implications for waste and cleansing services will also need to be fully assessed. This requires an investment of time and external challenge to ensure that the services we procure in future not only meet the changing legislative requirements but also future proof the services for the longer term. An extension of one year provides the time to develop the strategy to prepare for future challenges.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Approval of Cabinet Member sought to enter into a grant agreement.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Business and Planning
Decision published: 17/08/2020
Effective from: 25/08/2020
Decision:
1. That Appendix D to the report be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972, Schedule 12A Part 1, paragraph 3 (as amended), in that it contains information in relation to the business affairs of the council or any other body.
2. That the Cabinet Member authorised:
(2). The council to enter grant agreements with the project partners to pass on the obligations of the grant agreement between the City of London and Westminster City Council to the project partners.
(3). The delivery of the Central London Inclusive Growth Project as set out within the appended grant agreement.
(4). Capital expenditure against the budget within the capital programme of £1.605m of which £0.9m will be funded from the SIP grant and £0.705m will be funded by the Council.
1. The rationale for investing within the Central London Inclusive Growth Project is as follows:
· Inclusive growth alongside access to affordable workspace and business support are priority issues for London
· Low vacancy rates of central London, which are well below the Mayor’s availability threshold of 8%, confirms demand for space is outstripping supply resulting in instability, rising rents and narrowing of accommodation options. This situation is exasperated by a major net loss of employment space due in part to permitted development rights, which is in tension with the Mayor’s forecast for new jobs that London needs to accommodate.
· The bid proposal addresses the lack of affordable workspace and business support available in central London. The funding awarded will be invested in new affordable workspace with digital infrastructure and business support, mutually geared towards empowering entrepreneurs to overcome barriers to three critical stages in their early life, namely: setting up, employing their first employees and expanding.
· There is a strong economic case for the bid validated by a high-level cost benefit analysis by Adroit Economics.
· The bid will encourage collaboration between Central London boroughs. Camden, Hackney, Haringey, Kensington and Chelsea, Tower Hamlets and Westminster councils are well positioned and keen to work together to address the lack of affordable workspace and business support.
Staff working for Parliament's Strategic
Estates are due to occupy new offices in Dartmouth Street and
Victoria Street in 2020. In order to provide power and
communications resilience to those new offices, Parliament's
Strategic Estates have requested that the City Council install new
ducting and cables in the street under a Highways Act s278
agreement.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways
Decision published: 12/08/2020
Effective from: 12/08/2020
Decision:
1. That the report and other background papers to the report be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972 Schedule 12A, Paragraph 7, as amended, in that they contain information which “in all circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information’.
2. That the Cabinet Member for Environment & Highways approved the design and implementation of the ducting infrastructure works shown on Plans attached in Appendix B to the report.
3. That the Cabinet Member for Environment & Highways approved the gross expenditure of £4,000,000 to enable the completion of the detailed design and implementation of the ducting infrastructure works which will be fully funded by the Parliamentary Estates Directorate under the terms of a section 278 agreement.
4. That the Cabinet Member for Environment & Highways approved the agreement pursuant to section 278 of the Highways Act 1980 with the Parliamentary Estates Directorate to secure the works and funding.
5. That the Cabinet Member for Environment & Highways approved authority being delegated to the Executive Director of City Management and Communities to approve details of the secondary scheme in Little College Street and minor modifications to the scheme in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Environment & Highways.
1. The proposed ducting infrastructure works in the public highway identified in this report will improve business continuity and connectivity between buildings operated by the Parliamentary Estates Directorate.
2. The estimated cost of the proposals identified in this report is £4,000,000which includes, design costs, approvals, Westminster costs, risk and contingency etc. and will be fully funded by the Parliamentary Estates Directorate.
Wards affected: St James's;
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Children's Services
Decision published: 11/08/2020
Effective from: 11/08/2020
Decision:
1) That Appendix A to this report be exempt from public disclosure by virtue of paragraph 1 of Schedule 12a of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended) – Information Relating to a Particular Individual.
2) That the recommendations of the Local Authority School Governor’s Advisory Panel set out in Appendix A be approved.
Reasons for Decision
Every maintained school governing body must contain at least one Local Authority nominated school governor.
Cabinet Member approval sought for disposal of land.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 07/08/2020
Effective from: 15/08/2020
Decision:
1. That the appendices of the report be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972, Schedule 12A Part 1, paragraph 3 (as amended), in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).
2. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the terms of the leasehold interest to be granted to the Developer for 9 Woodfield Road and the subsequent lease terms to be granted by the Developer to Westminster City Council (WCC )for WCC’s use and occupation of a new street cleansing depot and noted that the proposed re-provision of the new depot facility combined with the Developer’s agreement to pay WCC’s Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) together with their S.106 Agreement obligations be accepted as WCC’s total financial consideration for the granting of a 999 year lease for 9 Woodfield Road.
3. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration granted the Executive Director of Finance and Resources and/or the Director of Corporate Property the delegated authority to complete the Agreement for Lease required for development of the New Depot and to enter into two leases, one to the Developer for WCC’s existing Depot site and the second for WCC’s use of the New Depot, both to be entered into on achievement of prcatical completion of the New Depot.
4. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the proposed amendments to the Section 106 Agreement and noted that such approval being required because the Council is the owner of the property asset to be disposed of.
Reasons for Decision
The Planning Consent (application reference number 19/04487/FULL) together with a Section106 Agreement granted on the 3 July 2020 includes an obligation upon the Developer to provide a new street sweepers depot for the Council. This provision can only be actuated once the Council has agreed terms for the disposal of its land at 9 Woodfield Road, to the developer.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital
Decision published: 03/08/2020
Effective from: 03/08/2020
Decision:
Summary of Decision
That the expenditure of £10,131 to commission the Out of School 2020-21 Holiday Programme as detailed in the report be approved.
Reason for Decision
The proposal in this report will support the Council’s wider equalities and diversity agenda by focusing on addressing local issues with enhanced local engagement.
Stuart Love, Chief Executive,
Westminster City Hall,
64 Victoria Street
LONDON SW1E 6QP
Publication Date: |
3 August 2020 |
Implementation Date: |
3 August 2020 |
Reference:
|
CMfCS&D/4/2020/21 |
Wards affected: Harrow Road;
Lead officer: Janis Best
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital
Decision published: 03/08/2020
Effective from: 03/08/2020
Decision:
Summary of Decision
That the expenditure of £14,278.40 to commission Hydra Fountain for St George’s Square be approved.
Reason for Decision
The proposal in this report will support the Council’s wider equalities and diversity agenda by focusing on addressing local issues with enhanced local engagement.
Stuart Love, Chief Executive,
Westminster City Hall,
64 Victoria Street
LONDON SW1E 6QP
Publication Date: |
3 August 2020 |
Implementation Date: |
3 August 2020 |
Reference:
|
CMfCS&D/2/2020/21 |
Wards affected: Tachbrook; Warwick;
Lead officer: Janis Best
Decision paper on Highways Services
Procurement Strategy.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 29/07/2020
Effective from: 06/08/2020
Decision:
Recommendations
The report will be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972, Schedule 12A Part 1, paragraph 3 (as amended), in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).
The Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration and the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways approved a 1-year extension of all contracts from April 2022- March 2023 to allow efforts to be concentrated on the City Council’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic in the U.K. and to develop the contract packaging in light of changing market conditions.
The Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration and the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways approved the procurement strategy and new operating model for the re-let of the service.
Reasons for Decision
The procurement strategy and future operating model which is outlined in this report will provide the best opportunity to deliver the required service improvements across the City Highways service to achieve the City Council’s ambition of a world class highways environment. It will also assist the City Council with meeting it’s ‘City for All’ objectives.
There is uncertainty as to how long it will take the highways and wider construction market to recover from the COVID 19 pandemic, so it is prudent to review the need for further extensions to the existing arrangement if required.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Philip Robson
Cabinet Member approval sought for delegating authority to operate a Development Sales Programme for a site in Parsons North.
Decision Maker: Leader of the Council
Decision published: 28/07/2020
Effective from: 29/07/2020
Decision:
1. Appendices 1 and 2 of this report being exempt from disclosure by the Local Government Act 1972, Schedule 12A, Part 1, paragraph 3, in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of any person (including the authority holding that information).
2. That the Leader of the Council delegated authority to the Executive Director of Growth, Planning and Housing or the Director of Development and named officers to approve reservations and the sale terms of private sales units at Venice Court, 124 Hall Place in accordance with section 5 of this report.
3. That the Leader of the Council delegated authority to the Executive Director of Growth, Planning and Housing or Director of Development and named officers to enter into all associated legal agreements in relation to decision 2 above.
Reasons for Decision
Approval of the recommendations will prevent any delays in accepting offers to formalise reservations which will ensure prospective purchasers receive confirmation of their offer being accepted in a timely manner without having to request Cabinet Member approval for each unit in turn.
Wards affected: Little Venice;
Officer Report
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 23/07/2020
Effective from: 23/07/2020
Decision:
1. That Appendix A to the report be declared exempt from publication as the business to be transacted involves the disclosure of information as prescribed by paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12a of the Act as it relates to information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority)
2. That the Cabinet Member approves the award of grants to the businesses shown at Appendix A to the report.
The proposed awards have each met the mandatory requirements of the scheme
and have been given an evaluation score sufficient to qualify for a grant.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Martin Hinckley
A decision is required on whether the
Westbourne Neighbourhood Forum should be re-designated for a
further 5 years.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Business and Planning
Decision published: 23/07/2020
Effective from: 23/07/2020
Decision:
Summary of Decision
That the Westbourne Neighbourhood Forum be re-designated for a further period of 5 years and a formal designation notice be published under delegated authority by the Director of Policy and Projects.
Reasons for Decision
The City Council is required to assess whether the purpose of the neighbourhood forum reflects (in general terms) the character of the area. The application submitted by the Forum for re-designation and the Forum Constitution indicate that the Forum was established to influence planning and development in the area to promote: A good mix of facilities and amenities, an attractive character and identity, a healthier environment, a good quality physical environment, a low carbon footprint and local employment and enterprise. The statement of purpose within the application also outlines that the forum will improve the social, economic and environmental wellbeing of the area using its planning influence.
Consultation on the re-designation of the Westbourne Neighbourhood Forum highlighted support for the application, no objections, or competing applications.
Stuart Love,
Chief Executive,
Westminster City Hall,
64 Victoria Street
LONDON SW1E 6QP
Publication Date:
|
10 July 2020 |
Implementation Date:
|
10 July 2020 |
Reference:
|
CMfB&P/3/2020/21 |
Wards affected: Bayswater; Westbourne;
Lead officer: Michela Leoni
Consider recommendations of the Discretionary
Housing Review Panel to award a payment
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 22/07/2020
Effective from: 22/07/2020
Decision:
1. That Appendix A to the report be exempt from public disclosure by virtue of paragraph 7 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972 because the applications involve the likely disclosure of exempt information relating to an individual.
2. That the Cabinet Member approved the recommendations of the Virtual Discretionary Housing Payment Review Advisory Panel meeting of 7 July 2020
The Virtual Discretionary Housing Payment Review Advisory Panel has set out the reasons for the recommendations in each case considered by the Panel in the recommendations in Appendix A to the report, which are more fully set out in the case papers submitted to the Panel.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Gwyn Thomas
This report identifies the progress made
towards the renewal of the Ebury Bridge Estate and seeks Cabinet
Member approval to progress all work necessary to establish a case
for compulsory purchase of land and property required for the
redevelopment of Pimlico House, Bridge House, Westbourne House, Rye
House, Bucknil House, Victoria House, and Donraile House (the Order
Land) as part of the Ebury Bridge Estate Renewal, whilst continuing
to negotiate and complete acquisitions of legal interests, on the
basis of the statutory Compulsory Purchase Compensation
Code.
Decision Maker: Cabinet
Decision published: 14/07/2020
Effective from: 14/07/2020
Decision:
That Cabinet:
1. Approved the progress of all work necessary to establish a case for compulsory purchase of the Order Land.
2. Approved, in principle, the use of compulsory purchase powers for the acquisition of the land required for development phases of the Ebury Bridge Estate Renewal redevelopment beyond the first phase. The extent of the land required is shown indicatively in hatched blue and orange on the attached plan at Appendix 1 of the report (referred to as the Order Land) and note that the making of any CPO will be subject to Cabinet being satisfied in all respects that the criteria in paragraph 3.7 of the report have been met.
3. Noted that Officers will need to seek a future resolution to grant authority, in accordance with section 122 of the Local Government Act 1972, to declare that any land acquired or held by the Council and required for the delivery of the Ebury Bridge Estate Renewal redevelopment may, where they conclude that it is no longer needed for its present purpose, appropriate the land for such statutory purpose as necessary to deliver the Ebury Bridge Estate Renewal redevelopment, and to authorise the overriding of such easements, rights, or other adverse matters burdening the land, where that is needed to deliver the scheme, in reliance on section 203 of the Housing and Planning Act 2016. Such appropriation may take place as a whole or in phases.
1. The Ebury Bridge Estate is one of the five priority estates identified in the Council’s Housing Renewal Strategy (2010) as needing significant improvement and investment. In line with the Council’s City for All objectives, the overarching objective of regenerating Ebury Bridge Estate is to create a comprehensive renewal that brings about physical, economic and sustainable change that creates additional homes and improves the lives of residents, businesses and visitors alike.
2. Whilst progress with property owners has been made in discussing acquisitions that will be necessary to deliver the proposals beyond the first phase of the Ebury Bridge Estate redevelopment, land assembly remains a critical issue for the delivery of this part of the scheme. Clearly the estate renewal cannot be delivered across properties that are not wholly in the ownership or under the control of the Council and without this, certainty cannot be gained to the likely programme for delivery of the complete estate renewal.
3. To enable the comprehensive redevelopment of the Ebury Bridge estate renewal all relevant land interests will need to be brought in, in a timely way. Whilst it is anticipated that further progress can be made on the negotiated approach for some property interests it is good practice and appropriate to consider the use of compulsory purchase powers.
4. The government recognises in its "Guidance on Compulsory Purchase Process and The Crichel Down Rules" dated July 2019, (the CPO Guidance), that if acquiring authorities wait for negotiations to break down, this can have detrimental impacts on the timing of delivery of projects. Therefore, depending on when the land is required, the guidance considers it sensible for an acquiring authority to:
· plan a compulsory purchase as a contingency measure; and
· initiate formal procedures.
·
5. Importantly, the CPO Guidance expressly recognises that such steps "...help to make the seriousness of the authority’s intentions clear from the outset, which in turn might encourage those whose land is affected to enter more readily into meaningful negotiations".
6. The CPO Guidance requires acquiring authorities to attempt to acquire land by agreement before embarking on the CPO process, although it is recognised that for schemes involving the acquisition of the number of interests, it is sensible to run the CPO process in parallel with ongoing negotiations.
7. The use of compulsory purchase powers to assemble the Ebury Bridge Estate Renewal scheme site for phases beyond the first phase will be used should all reasonable attempts to acquire the necessary land and interests fail. As the CPO Guidance makes clear, use of compulsory purchase powers is intended as a 'last resort'. Officers acknowledge that if any CPO was to be made the Cabinet would require further updating and justification.
8. In this event. a detailed report setting out the justification for the making of a CPO together with the proposed Statement of Reasons would be submitted to Members.
9. The main benefit of the use of compulsory purchase is the certainty of being able to obtain vacant possession to a planned programme. This is vital in order give the Council confidence that the whole Ebury Bridge estate renewal will be delivered. The use of compulsory purchase also provides a level of certainty on project programming which in turn would allow the Council to enter into commercially sound construction contracts. This is because, once the CPO is confirmed and the legal challenge period has passed, the CPO can be implemented and a date for vacant possession fixed in accordance with the project programme which can immediately follow or coincide with the programme for the first phase of redevelopment.
Wards affected: Churchill;
Lead officer: Barbara Brownlee
Decision Maker: Planning Applications Sub-Committee (2)
Made at meeting: 23/06/2020 - Planning Applications Sub-Committee (2)
Decision published: 13/07/2020
Effective from: 23/06/2020
Decision:
Retention of air conditioning condenser unit at rear ground floor roof level and proposed installation of acoustic enclosure.
The Presenting Officer tabled the followingadditional Condition
Item No. 5 Flat 2 21 Denbigh Street London SW1V 2HF
Additional condition
The plant/machinery hereby permitted shall not be operated except between 0700 hours and 2300 hours daily.
RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY:
That conditional permission be granted subject to the additional Condition as tabled to control the operational hours of the plant between 7am – 11pm only and a further condition requiring a post commissioning acoustic survey to be undertaken and submitted for approval. |
Wards affected: Warwick;
Cabiinet Member approval sought.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 09/07/2020
Effective from: 17/07/2020
Decision:
1) That part B of the report be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972, Schedule 12A Part 1, paragraph 3 (as amended), in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).
2) That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property, and Regeneration and the Cabinet Member for Adult Social Care and Public Health:
I. Approved and agreed the preferred option as set out in paragraph 9.1 in the report, to deliver 65 extra-care and 22 general needs units, subject to final design, which would be fully examined during the next stage of the project.
II. Note that Carlton Dene was no longer required as a care home and would no longer be reserved for that purpose.
III. Approved the allocation of £2.067M to develop the design for the site up to and including RIBA Stage 4 and to enable the relocation of residents from Peebles House. The Outline Business Case would seek approval to submit a planning application based on the Preferred Way Forward.
IV. To note the formation of a cross-directorate project board to aid the delivery of the project. The board would consist of the senior or director nominated officers from Adult Social Care Operations and Commissioning, Housing and Regeneration, Finance, Procurement, Development and Legal.
3) Agreed to authorise the Executive Director of Growth, Planning and Housing in consultation with the Executive Director Adult Social Care and Health and the Bi-Borough Director of Law, to deal with all necessary legal arrangements to give effect to the recommendations set out in the report.
Reasons for Decisions
1) The key drivers for decision making were:
I. Beachcroft Care Home was a new purpose-built accommodation for those currently living in Carlton Dene; the closure of Carlton Dene was agreed by Cabinet Members in April 2019 following extensive consultation with residents and relatives;
II. Bringing forward additional capacity and new forms of care on sites where the Council was the freeholder (facilitated by moving existing residents to Beachcroft);
III. Provide new affordable homes in line with the Council’s planning policy;
IV. Bringing forward new affordable housing which would contribute towards meeting the 20/21 City for All objectives, in particular Vibrant Communities.
V. Improve the environmental performance of Council properties, saving energy and money;
VI. Offer current Council tenants the chance to stay in their current neighbourhood should they wish; and
VII. Deliver viable options which consider the duty of the Council to safeguard the public purse.
The Fixed Point Car Sharing Club Services
contract, provided by Zipcar (UK) Ltd, provides 185 vehicles,
operating from dedicated car club bays, for hire by residents and
businesses who are signed up to the scheme as an alternative to
private vehicle ownership. The proposal is to extend the contract
by 2 years. The provision of the service will remain the same,
other than the contract expiry date.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways
Decision published: 07/07/2020
Effective from: 07/07/2020
Decision:
2. Recommendations
2.1 That the Cabinet Member for Environment and City Highways approved the extension of the contract for Fixed Point car sharing (Lot 1) for 1 year with no change to the terms of contract.
2.2 That the Cabinet for Environment and City Highways approved the extension of the contract for Flexible car sharing (Lot 2) for 1 year and the variation of the contract to increase, from 90 to 135, the maximum number of vehicles allowed to operate in the City.
3. Reasons for Decision
3.1 The extension of the service by one year will allow sufficient time to procure a broad service incorporating three models of car sharing. This will serve to increase the number of available vehicles to residents, introduce competition to the market and meet the financial shortfall generated by the departure of Drive Now from the UK market.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Darren Montague
The lighting master plan lays down a strategy
and strategic approach to manage the application and use of
artificial light across the city.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways
Decision published: 06/07/2020
Effective from: 06/07/2020
Decision:
1. Recommendations
1.1 The Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways approved the adoption of the Westminster Lighting Master Plan 2020-2040.
1.2 The Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways approved the following associated Westminster lighting guides;
i) Lighting Design Guide
ii) Third Party Attachments / Smart Lighting Column Guide
iii) Temporary Public Lighting Works Guide
iv) Earthing and Electrical Arrangements for Street Furniture
2. Reasons for Decision
2.1 The Lighting Master Plan 2020-2040 allows the council to have a strategic approach to managing the application and use of artificial light across the city. Co-ordinating the use and appearance of lit assets throughout the city gives an added identity to specific areas and allows quality of a consistent approach from all parties wishing to influence the night-time economy.
2.2 To ensures quality through design by competent professionals so that the lighting serves its purpose, mindful of associated energy costs and likely impact on the environment, and consider the sustainability of the lighting performance for the tasks that are being lit.
2.3 The Lighting Design Guide supports the Lighting Master Plan and defines a standard of lighting “The Westminster Standard” appropriate to the needs of the council and its highway and public realm users to assist schemes meet a common criteria.
2.4 The Third-Party Attachments / Smart Lighting Column guide allows the council to consider the strategy / approach to take when thinking about lighting columns as structures. Columns have been designed to support a luminaire, bracket, sign and perhaps some other specific attachments. Therefore, it is important that they are considered as a structure and their structural capacity assessed when making any attachment consideration. It is vital for public safety that a strategy and approach is in place to avoid the columns being overburdened by attachments.
2.5 The Temporary Public Lighting Works Guide advises on the procedures and requirements when public lighting is requested to be removed, such that appropriate solutions can be agreed to meet the needs of developments scaffolding or hoarding, whilst not adversely affecting the highway.
2.6 The Earthing & Electrical Arrangements for Street Furniture identifies accepted historic Westminster common practice and explores reasons behind those practices and if they should be formally adopted. This allows the benefits of those common practices used during the current framework to become standard practice.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Philip Robson
Cabinet Member approval sought for terms of Section 106 details,
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 26/06/2020
Effective from: 26/06/2020
Decision:
That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration gave consent to 9 Woodfield Road, W9 be included in the development site to which the terms of the Section 106 Agreement apply.
Reasons for Decision
1. The Section (S.).106 Agreement is being entered into by both Westminster City Council (WCC) s landowner and WCC as the Local Planning Authority.
2. The S.106 is entered into purely to secure the relevant planning obligations should the development proceed. The Council as landowner is entering into it purely as a “consenting freeholder”.The Council will not be liable for any of the obligations unless they initiate the development themselves, and even then, only to the extent that they affect the Council’s land.
3. The S.106 Agreement contains an obligation requiring the Developer to enter into a further contract with WCC, (as landowner), prior to the commencement of any works to secure the provision of a new street sweeper depot at the developer’s cost. The relevant property contract in this regard will be the subject of a further Cabinet Member report in due course.
Approval to award a contract for the Urban Design services required to support the delivery of the Oxford Street District Place Shaping Project sought.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 26/06/2020
Effective from: 04/07/2020
Decision:
1. That this report be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972, Schedule 12A Part 1, paragraph 3 (as amended), in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).
2. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the award a contract for the Urban Design (Design Guardian) services of the Oxford Street District place shaping project to the preferred bidder, for a period of three years with an optional two year extension for a maximum contract value as set out in the report.
Reasons for Decision
The Council conducted the procurement activity via the Greater London Authority’s Architecture Design and Urbanism Panel (ADUP) framework, which means that all the framework suppliers had already undergone technical and commercial testing to achieve their place in the framework. A review of the Lot structure of the ADUP framework identified Lot 1, (Urban Strategies , Spatial Policy and Research) as appropriate for providing the services required of the Design Guardian, with significant scope alignment with the Council requirements. Any one of these framework providers had the technical potential to deliver the required services for the Council.
Consider recommendations of the Rating
Advisory Panel in relation to applications for Hardship and
Discretionary Rate Relief
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 22/06/2020
Effective from: 22/06/2020
Decision:
1. That this report and appendices be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972 Schedule 12A, Part 1, Paragraph 3, as amended, in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of an individual.
2. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the recommendations of the Rating Advisory Panel held on 2nd June 2020 and determined the applications for National Non-Domestic Rates Discretionary and Hardship relief as set out in Appendix A of the report.
Reasons for Decision
The Rating Advisory Panel has set out the reasons for the recommendations in each case considered by the Panel in the recommendations in Appendix A of the report.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Susan Bush
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital
Decision published: 19/06/2020
Effective from: 19/06/2020
Decision:
Summary of Decision
That the expenditure of £33,582.90 to commission Hanging Baskets be approved.
Reason for Decision
The proposal in this report will support the Council’s wider equalities and diversity agenda by focusing on addressing local issues with enhanced local engagement.
Stuart Love, Chief Executive,
Westminster City Hall,
64 Victoria Street
LONDON SW1E 6QP
Publication Date: |
19 June 2020 |
Implementation Date: |
19 June 2020 |
Reference:
|
CMfCS&D/1/2020/21 |
Wards affected: Marylebone;
Lead officer: Janis Best
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Children's Services
Decision published: 17/06/2020
Effective from: 25/06/2020
Decision:
1. That Part B of this report be exempt from disclosure under s100B(2) and Schedule 12 A of the Local Government Act 1972, (as amended) in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).
2. That the Cabinet Member for Children’s Services
· Grant approval to enter into a Design & Build contract with Neilcott Construction Limited, for construction of a new Nursery at the Younger Years Site, for £2.373m, and
· Grant approval to enter into a Design & Build contract with Neilcott Construction Limited, for construction of a new dining hall and refurbishment works at the Older Years Site for £1.809m.
3. That the Cabinet Member for Children’s Services authorised the Director of Law to negotiate and sign with Neilcott Construction Limited two Design & Build contracts and, with ARK Schools, a Development Agreement for each site.
Reasons for the Decision
1. As part of the Council’s approved Secondary School Expansion programme, King Solomon Academy was subject to a building project. This would enable the Council to fulfil its statutory duty to provide a school place for every child who needs one in its area.
2. The tender evaluation report (Gate 3) was presented to the Commercial Gateway Review Board (CGRB) on 12 May 2020. CGRC endorsed the recommendation of award to the Bi-Borough Executive Director of Children’s Services to award the contracts to Neilcott Construction Limited, Registered Company Number 1151561.
The Gate 3 paper and the cost consultant commercial tender review are attached as Appendices A and B to the report.
3. The proposed contract value was within the programme budget negotiated with the School and ARK. Overall expenditure was in line with the Pre-Tender Estimate and had been verified by Finance (please see the Financial Implications slide in the Gate 3 paper - slides 10 &11 of Appendix A).
Wards affected: Church Street;
Lead officer: Alan Wharton
Approval required to re-designate
Knightsbridge Neighbourhood Forum for a further 5 years, to enable
them to continue carrying out neighbourhood planning matters in
Knightsbridge Neighbourhood Area
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Business and Planning
Decision published: 05/06/2020
Effective from: 05/06/2020
Decision:
That the Knightsbridge Neighbourhood Forum be re-designated for a further period of 5 years and a formal designation notice be published under delegated authority by the Director of Policy and Projects.
Reasons for Decision
The City Council is required to assess whether the purpose of the neighbourhood forum reflects (in general terms) the character of the area. The application submitted by the Forum for re-designation states that the Forum was established with the purpose of making Knightsbridge the most desirable and attractive residential and cultural area in London in which to live, work, study, and visit. A number of priorities are identified for the Forum, which include:
· Seeking to ensure the neighbourhood portion of CIL are utilised in line
with the Knightsbridge Neighbourhood Plan
· Reviewing the policies in the ‘made’ Knightsbridge Neighbourhood
Plan and updating as necessary;
· Commenting on planning applications or consultations relating to the
Neighbourhood Area.
These priorities represent strong reasons for the Neighbourhood Forum to continue
to carry out neighbourhood planning responsibilities in the area. Consultation on the
re-designation application also highlighted support for the application, no objections,
or competing applications.
Stuart Love,
Chief Executive,
Westminster City Hall,
64 Victoria Street
LONDON SW1E 6QP
Publication Date:
|
3 June 2020 |
Implementation Date:
|
3 June 2020 |
Reference:
|
CMfB&P/2/2019/20 |
Wards affected: Knightsbridge and Belgravia;
Lead officer: Sean Walsh
Cabinet Member approval sought for Homelessness Strategy.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Hsg Services
Decision published: 02/06/2020
Effective from: 10/06/2020
Decision:
1. That the Cabinet Member for Housing Services agreed the Homelessness Strategy 2019 – 2024 as set out in Appendix B of the report.
2. That the Cabinet Member for Housing agreed the Homelessness Strategy 2019 – 2024 Action Plan in Appendix C of the report and that noted it be updated regularly.
3. That the Cabinet Member for Housing Services delegated authority to the Director responsible for Housing to update the Action Plan in conjunction with the Cabinet Member responsible for Housing.
Reasons for Decision
The Homelessness Act 2002 and the Homelessness Reduction Act 2017 require local authorities to have in place a Homelessness Strategy informed by the results of Homelessness Review. A new Homelessness Strategy is also needed to ensure that the council is doing everything possible to prevent and respond to homelessness in the city.
Approval of Cabinet Members sought.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 27/05/2020
Effective from: 27/05/2020
Decision:
1. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration and the Cabinet Member for Business and Planning agreed that the Council follows the government guidance for the scheme by seeking applications from businesses within each of the government’s four priority business sectors, viz:
• Small businesses in shared offices or other flexible workspaces. Examples could include units in industrial parks, science parks and incubators which do not have their own business rates assessment;
• Regular market traders with fixed building costs, such as rent, who do not have their own business rates assessment;
• Bed & Breakfasts which pay Council Tax instead of business rates and
• Charity properties in receipt of charitable business rates relief which would otherwise have been eligible for Small Business Rates Relief or Rural Rate Relief.
2. That in accordance with the government’s guidance, the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration and the Cabinet Member for Business and Planning agreed that to be eligible, each business must meet the following criteria:
• Be a small or micro business, as defined in Section 33 Part 2 of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 and the Companies Act 2006;
• Have relatively high ongoing fixed property-related costs;
• Be able to demonstrate that they have suffered a significant fall in income due to the COVID-19 crisis and
• Occupy property, or part of a property, with a rateable value or annual rent or annual mortgage payments below £51,000.
3. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration and the Cabinet Member for Business and Planning agreed that businesses that qualify under the Council’s discretionary scheme will each be awarded a grant of £10,000, irrespective of whether they would have qualified for £10,000 or £25,000 under the main grant scheme if they had a unit of occupation within the Valuation List.
4. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration and the Cabinet Member for Business and Planning agreed that a Cabinet panel, supported by officers, evaluates the applications received against the requirements within the government’s guidance (Appendix A of the report), the criteria set out in 1. and 2. above, together with how each business benefits Westminster residents and the local community and noted that the panel is to subsequently make a recommendation to the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration for a formal determination.
Reasons for Decision
1. The proposed criteria matches the government’s stated priority objectives.
2. The proposed criteria will support the largest cohort of businesses that have contacted the Council that do not qualify under the main grants scheme, with the exception of businesses excluded under the main grants scheme.
Cabinet Member approval sought.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 22/05/2020
Effective from: 02/06/2020
Decision:
1. That the report be declared exempt from publication as, the business to be transacted involves the disclosure of information as prescribed by paragraph 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 12a of the Act relating to information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority).
2. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration gave to the writing off the irrecoverable debt as shown in paragraph 5.1 of the report.
3. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration noted the amounts shown in paragraph 6.1 of the report as written-off under officer delegated authority.
Reasons for Decision
The recommendation to write-off the amounts detailed in this report is proposed as all other avenues available to the Council for the recovery of these debts have been exhausted, including, where appropriate, the issue of distress proceedings.
Cabinet Member approval sought.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 22/05/2020
Effective from: 02/06/2020
Decision:
1. That this report be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972, Schedule 12A, Part 1, paragraph 3, in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).
2. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the disposal of 24 units in Hounslow to the specified organisation at the agreed disposal price as detailed in the report.
3. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration delegated authority to the Director of Housing, in conjunction with the Director of Law, to agree the contract terms and to conclude the contract.
Reasons for Decision
Approval of the recommendations will enable the City Council to dispose of the 24 Housing Revenue Account owned units. The income received will be reinvested in replacement homes to be used for Social Housing.
Cabinet Member approval sought.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 18/05/2020
Effective from: 18/05/2020
Decision:
That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the revised National Non-Domestic Rates Discretionary Relief guidelines as shown in Appendix A of the report.
Reason for Decision
1. The proposed guidelines at Appendix A of the report will, by providing criteria to be considered when making decisions, assist with robust and consistent decision-making.
2. That delegated authority is given to the Director of Revenues and Benefits to amend the scheme entitlement percentage during the financial year if it appears that the not all of the government funding will be utilised by the scheme’s deadline (30 September 2021).
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital
Decision published: 16/05/2020
Effective from: 16/05/2020
Decision:
Summary of Decision
That the expenditure of £14,000 to commission the Pimlico Neighbourhood Forum be approved.
Reason for Decision
The proposal in this report will support the Council’s wider equalities and diversity agenda by focusing on addressing local issues with enhanced local engagement.
Stuart Love, Chief Executive,
Westminster City Hall,
64 Victoria Street
LONDON SW1E 6QP
Publication Date: |
18 May 2020 |
Implementation Date: |
18 May 2020 |
Reference:
|
CMfCS&D/10/2019/20 |
Wards affected: Churchill; Tachbrook; Warwick;
Lead officer: Janis Best
Cabinet Member appproval sought to take various financial measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 15/05/2020
Effective from: 23/05/2020
Decision:
That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved:
1.1.The financial governance related to COVID-19 expenditure as per section 7 and the revised approval routes to ensure a co-ordinated consistent response to the operational needs that arise from the pandemic.
1.2.The allocation of any COVID-19 government funding to be delegated to the Executive Director of Finance and Resources, in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration.
1.3.The financial support measures for the Council’s commercial tenants as noted in paragraph 6.7 of the report and delegated authority to the Executive Director of Finance and Resources to extend this in line with the financial governance as noted in section 7.
1.4.The brokerage facility as part of the Westminster Connects platform, as per paragraphs 6.9 to 6.12 of the report.
1.5.The continuation of immediate payment terms, even as the Council enters BAU with the IBC.
1.6.The income and debt management policies and delegations of these policies during the current crisis as per section 8 of the report.
1.7.That Westminster City Council act as the lead borough for the London Strategic Coordination Group for the provision of additional mortuary space across London, incurring all initial expenditure on the instructions of the mortuaries planning group and subsequently recovering this from the other London boroughs as set out in section 9 of the report.
1.8.The types of relief (as outlined in section 10) the Council may offer to suppliers in line with the financial approval limits set out in section 7.
Reasons for Decision
1. COVID-19 is impacting everything the Council does and is having an adverse effect on the economy and the resident and business communities that the Council serves. The Leader, Cabinet, Executive Leadership Team and other council officers are responding to this crisis daily.
2. In the current circumstances where the Council is functioning outside of business as usual it is important to have an agreed financial framework within which the Council operates. This report sets out how the financial framework can be adapted within the boundaries of the financial regulations and the scheme of delegation. This ensures financial decisions are linked to operational and strategic needs specific to the Council’s response to the crisis, with decisions being made at the appropriate level and by the appropriate individual or group.
3. The recommendations as set out in section 2 of the report and the Council’s financial management of the situation as outlined in sections 6-8 are considered to be the most appropriate and efficient way to assist the aforementioned groups to respond to this international pandemic.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways
Decision published: 12/05/2020
Effective from: 22/05/2020
Decision:
Recommendations
1. The Cabinet Member for Environment and Highwaysreaffirmed the City Council’s support for the Quietway St John’s Wood to Marylebone scheme, as part of the Central London Cycle Grid, and agreed to it being implemented.
2. Approval was granted by the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highwaysto undertake design and implementation of the proposed Quietway St John’s Wood to Marylebone scheme, as part of the Central London Cycle Grid.
3. The Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways gave delegated authority to the Executive Director for City Management and Communities to agree final scheme proposals and to enter into any necessary legal agreements with Transport for London, in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways.
4. The Cabinet Member for Environment and Highwaysgave delegated authority to the Executive Director for City Management and Communities to make any requisite traffic regulation orders associated with the scheme.
5. The Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways approved capital expenditure to the sum of £3,402,074to complete the scheme.
Reasons for Decision
1. The proposed scheme will contribute to the adopted November 2013 and subsequent updated November 2016 City of Westminster City Plan objectives. It is intended that this scheme will:
· Provide legible and safer routes for cycle traffic.
· Improve the public realm and pedestrian facilities.
· Improve health. This will be achieved in part by encouraging more everyday journeys to be made by active transportation. Improvements to pedestrian facilities are also proposed as part of the scheme.
· Encourage more people to cycle. This will be achieved by implementing a scheme suitable for all people who want to cycle in the area, particularly those wishing to avoid some of the busier, highly trafficked main roads.
· Reduce CO2 emissions. This will be achieved in part by encouraging modal shift from private motor vehicles to bicycles.
· Reduce overcrowding on public transport. This will be achieved in part by encouraging more journeys to be made by bicycle.
Wards affected: Abbey Road; Bryanston and Dorset Square; Church Street; Regent's Park;
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital
Decision published: 06/05/2020
Effective from: 06/05/2020
Decision:
Notice is hereby given that the Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital has made the following executive decision on the above mentioned subject for the reason set out below.
Summary of Decision
That expenditure of £16,153.80 to commission Hanging Baskets be approved.
Reason for Decision
The proposal in this report will support the Council’s wider equalities and diversity agenda by focusing on addressing local issues with enhanced local engagement.
Stuart Love, Chief Executive,
Westminster City Hall,
64 Victoria Street
LONDON SW1E 6QP
Publication Date: |
6 May 2020 |
Implementation Date: |
6 May 2020 |
Reference:
|
CMfCS&D/9/2019/20 |
Wards affected: Warwick;
Lead officer: Janis Best
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital
Decision published: 06/05/2020
Effective from: 06/05/2020
Decision:
Notice is hereby given that the Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital has made the following executive decision on the above mentioned subject for the reason set out below.
Summary of Decision
That expenditure of £10,627.50 to commission Hanging Baskets be approved.
Reason for Decision
The proposal in this report will support the Council’s wider equalities and diversity agenda by focusing on addressing local issues with enhanced local engagement.
Stuart Love, Chief Executive,
Westminster City Hall,
64 Victoria Street
LONDON SW1E 6QP
Publication Date: |
6 May 2020 |
Implementation Date: |
6 May 2020 |
Reference:
|
CMfCS&D/8/2019/20 |
Wards affected: Vincent Square;
Lead officer: Janis Best
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital
Decision published: 06/05/2020
Effective from: 06/05/2020
Decision:
SUBJECT: |
Expenditure from the Little Venice Ward Budget for Hanging Baskets
|
Notice is hereby given thatthe Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital has made the following executive decision on the above mentioned subject for the reason set out below.
Summary of Decision
That expenditure of £21,255 to commission Hanging Baskets be approved.
Reason for Decision
The proposal in this report will support the Council’s wider equalities and diversity agenda by focusing on addressing local issues with enhanced local engagement.
Stuart Love, Chief Executive,
Westminster City Hall,
64 Victoria Street
LONDON SW1E 6QP
Publication Date: |
6 May 2020 |
Implementation Date: |
6 May 2020 |
Reference:
|
CMfCS&D/7/2019/20 |
Wards affected: Little Venice;
Lead officer: Janis Best
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital
Decision published: 06/05/2020
Effective from: 06/05/2020
Decision:
Summary of Decision
That expenditure of £14,736.80 to commission Hanging Baskets be approved.
Reason for Decision
The proposal in this report will support the Council’s wider equalities and diversity agenda by focusing on addressing local issues with enhanced local engagement.
Stuart Love, Chief Executive,
Westminster City Hall,
64 Victoria Street
LONDON SW1E 6QP
Publication Date: |
6 May 2020 |
Implementation Date: |
6 May 2020 |
Reference:
|
CMfCS&D/6/2019/20 |
Wards affected: Abbey Road;
Lead officer: Janis Best
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 29/04/2020
Effective from: 29/04/2020
Decision:
1. That this report and appendices be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972 Schedule 12A, Part 1, Paragraph 3, as amended, in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of an individual.
2. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the recommendations of the Rating Advisory Panel held on 10th March 2020 and determined the applications for National Non-Domestic Rates Discretionary and Hardship relief as set out in Appendix A of the report.
Reasons for Decision
The Rating Advisory Panel has set out the reasons for the recommendations in each case considered by the Panel in the recommendations in Appendix A of the report.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Susan Bush
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Business and Planning
Decision published: 24/04/2020
Effective from: 24/04/2020
Decision:
Reasons for Decision
The City Council is required to assess whether the purpose of the neighbourhood forum reflects (in general terms) the character of the area. The application submitted by the Forum for re-designation states that the Forum was established to promote and improve the economic and environmental wellbeing of the area. It also makes clear that the continued preparation of a neighbourhood plan is a priority for the Forum. The Forum has carried out significant initial work on the neighbourhood plan and will carry out consultation on a draft plan in the upcoming months. The main purpose for the existence of the St James’s Neighbourhood Forum is therefore stronger now than when it was initially designated.
Consultation on the re-designation of the St James’s Neighbourhood Forum highlighted support for the application and no objections or competing applications had been received.
Stuart Love,
Chief Executive,
Westminster City Hall,
64 Victoria Street
LONDON
SW1E 6QP
Publication Date:
|
24 April 2020 |
Implementation Date:
|
24 April 2020 |
Reference:
|
CMfB&P/4/2019/20 |
Wards affected: St James's;
Lead officer: Ezra Wallace
Between 17 September 2019 and 10 December 2019
a public consultation of a proposed 20mph Limit across the City of
Westminster Highway Network was undertaken. This report advises on
the findings of the consultation and presents a recommendation for
consideration and approval.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways
Decision published: 23/04/2020
Effective from: 01/05/2020
Decision:
That the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways agreed that the proposed borough-wide 20mph scheme be implemented on the basis of:
· Final design and delivery on the street be subject to the ongoing changes to the City Council’s services as it manages the current COVID-19 crisis and when an agreed point in the future is reached where the delivery of new schemes can be re-activated again
· The results of the recent public consultation that ended on 10 December 2019, where two thirds of the respondents supported the proposed scheme;
· The supporting killed and serious injury casualty related collisions evidence which indicates that these have flatlined since 2015 and that many of these relate to collisions with ‘vulnerable’ pedestrians and cyclists, of which a borough-wide 20mph limit can greatly reduce the severity of such;
· The supporting evidence of the 2017 trial of 39 20mph zones where demonstrable reductions in recorded speed were evident;
· Government legislation that empowers the City Council to consider the implementation of a borough-wide 20mph limit across its Highway Network;
· The proposed Communications Plan that is set out in section 9 and appendix 4 of this report which includes the additional items set out in paragraph 9.3, which in particular seeks approval for the placing of 20mph limit messaging on City Council contracted vehicles and the hiring of advertising space on the backs of selected London buses;
· The proposed Highways Scheme of 20mph on-street signs that is set out in section 10 of this report; and
· The proposed estimated £1,406,887 cost of implementing the combined Communications Plan and Highways Scheme programme in 2020/21, as set out in Section 11 of the report.
Reasons for Decision
1. In 2018 there were three fatalities on Westminster’s combined highway network and a further 269 individuals were seriously injured. By reducing our Borough-wide speed limit from 30mph to 20mph will mean that a person is five times more likely to survive if it is in a collision with a motorised vehicle.
2. A 20mph Westminster speed limit will also encourage a calmer and more respectful street environment for all of us who live, work, study or visit our great city. The proposal will also seek to encourage more to walk and cycle which in turn will deliver wider health and wellbeing benefits across all age groups.
3. 66% of respondents to the recent public consultation of a borough-wide 20mph Limit were in support of the proposed scheme and a 20mph borough is also a key aim of our City for All ambition to develop a Greener and Cleaner Westminster.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Business and Planning
Decision published: 15/04/2020
Effective from: 23/04/2020
Decision:
The Cabinet Member for Business and Planning was asked to:
1. Approve the allocation of £0.272m from Westminster’s Neighbourhood CIL Portion. This covered the provisional allocation of funding for the projects set out in Appendix C, as follows:
(i) Bishop’s Bridge Public Realm Action Plan
(ii) Norfolk Square Gardens Showcase Garden
(iii) Star Street Green Space Improvements
(iv) Edgware Road Insights Study
(v) Central Island Improvements for Elgin Avenue
(vi) Charing Cross Road Area Public Realm
2. Note the recommendations on further project proposals for Westminster’s Neighbourhood CIL Portion, as submitted by local communities.
Reasons for Decision
In order to ensure robust and effective expenditure and reporting in line with the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010 (as amended) and in accordance with the council’s strategic priorities, CIL spending policy statement and its framework for resource allocation and management.
Lead officer: Ezra Wallace
Cabinet Member approval sought.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 09/04/2020
Effective from: 09/04/2020
Decision:
That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration gave approval to increase the disregard that is applied to earnings by £20 per week within the Council’s Council Tax Support scheme.
Reason for Decision
The recommendation aligns with the principles of City for All and ensures that the government’s recent increase in working tax credit, announced as part of the Covid-19 response, is not clawed back from the borough’s claimants via the Council’s Council Tax Support calculation.
Cabinet Member approval sought.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 31/03/2020
Effective from: 31/03/2020
Decision:
1. That this report be exempt from publication under paragraph 3 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972 as it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of a particular person (including the authority holding that information)
2. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the granting of new leases to the organisation as detailed in the report for a term in line with the terms and length of the services contract awarded to the organisation already and to be co-terminous with the service contract in existence.
Reasons for Decision
The fundamental reason for granting leases is to ensure and secure immediate continuity of essential services to vulnerable residents currently living within Carlton Dene and Westmead or in need of the services at these homes.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital
Decision published: 30/03/2020
Effective from: 30/03/2020
Decision:
Reason for Decision
The proposal in this report will support the Council’s wider equalities and diversity agenda by focusing on addressing local issues with enhanced local engagement.
Stuart Love, Chief Executive,
Westminster City Hall,
64 Victoria Street
LONDON SW1E 6QP
Publication Date: |
30 March 2020 |
Implementation Date: |
30 March 2020 |
Reference:
|
CMfCS&D/3/2019/20 |
Wards affected: Harrow Road; Maida Vale; Westbourne;
Lead officer: Janis Best
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital
Decision published: 30/03/2020
Effective from: 30/03/2020
Decision:
That expenditure of £20,000 to commission The Z2K Advice Clinic be approved.
Reason for Decision
The proposal in this report will support the Council’s wider equalities and diversity agenda by focusing on addressing local issues with enhanced local engagement.
Stuart Love, Chief Executive,
Westminster City Hall,
64 Victoria Street
LONDON SW1E 6QP
Publication Date: |
30 March 2020 |
Implementation Date: |
30 March 2020 |
Reference:
|
CMfCS&D/5/2019/20 |
Wards affected: Church Street; Churchill; Harrow Road; Maida Vale; Queen's Park; Westbourne;
Lead officer: Janis Best
Cabinet Member approval sought for contract award.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Hsg Services
Decision published: 26/03/2020
Effective from: 03/04/2020
Decision:
1. That this report be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972 Schedule 12A, Part 1, paragraph 3 (as amended), in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).
2. That the Cabinet Member for Housing Services approved the decision to award the contract to the preferred bidder as part of a competitive tender process for the period from 1st July 2020 to 30th June 2024 for a total amount as set out in the report, with an optional one year extension.
3. That the Cabinet Member for Housing Services delegated authority to the Director of Housing to consider/approve taking up the option of the one year extension, as allowed for within the contract conditions.
Reasons for Decision
Regulation 72 (1) of the Public Contract Regulations 2015 require that for any variation clauses to be lawful they must be couched in ‘clear, precise and unequivocal’ terms, that state the scope and nature of possible modifications. This contract must be put onto a compliant contractual footing with clear start/expiry dates and provisions to extend that do not continue indefinitely.
Approval from the Leader of the Council sought for the contract award for temporary agency workers.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 25/03/2020
Effective from: 02/04/2020
Decision:
1. That this report be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972 Schedule 12A, Part 1, paragraph 3 (as amended), in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of any person (including the authority holding that information).
2. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the direct award of a new contract to the preferred bidder on the YPO2 Framework (Option 3) with a call off for two years with an option to renew up to a further two years
Reasons for Decision
The rationale for this decision is that this ensures continuity of services and is the lowest risk option.
Report to approve the reorganisation of the
property service
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 13/03/2020
Effective from: 21/03/2020
Decision:
1. That following formal consultation with staff and unions, the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration gave approval for the new proposed structure to be implemented.
2. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration agreed that a Director of Property and Strategic Asset Management be added to the structure to provide dedicated focus and oversight of the Corporate Property portfolio.
3. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration agreed that the new structure be implemented by 1st April 2020.
Reasons for Decision
Having considered staff feedback and the recommendations from the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) to reorganise and implement a new Corporate Landlord model, it was been agreed to consult staff and unions on a proposed new structure.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Natalie Roberts
Cabinet Member approval sought for the restructure of Procurement Services.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 11/03/2020
Effective from: 19/03/2020
Decision:
1. That this report be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972, Schedule 12A Part 1, paragraph 3 (as amended), in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).
2. That Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration agreed to the implementation of the proposed Procurement Services structure as detailed in the report, to take effect from 6th April 2020.
3. That Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration authorised the relevant officers (in this case, the Executive Director for Finance and Resources and his nominated delegates) to undertake such recruitment activities as are necessary to populate the new structure, in line with the Council’s normal policies and procedures.
4. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration notes that in line with Council policy, employees on the Council's Talent Pool who are in a redundancy situation will be given priority consideration for the new post(s) created prior to the post(s) being advertised and noted that this may include providing training to the redeployee, where appropriate, subject to costs and individual potential benefit.
Reasons for Decision
The reason for this decision is to implement the organisational changes required to enable the council’s new Procurement Service to come into operational effect from 6th April 2020.
Planned Preventative Maintenance (PPM)
programme for 2020/21 in respect of Highways, Public Lighting &
Bridges and Structures
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways
Decision published: 10/03/2020
Effective from: 18/03/2020
Decision:
2. Recommendations
2.1 The detailed proposals for the Highways PPM programme for 2020/21 at an estimated gross cost of £6,576,000 as detailed in Section 5.1 and Appendix A was approved.
2.2 The detailed proposals for the Bridges and Structures PPM programme for 2020/21 at an estimated gross cost of £1,730,000, as detailed in Section 5.2 was approved.
2.3 The detailed proposals for Public Lighting PPM programme for 2020/21 at an estimated gross cost of £3,271,000, as detailed in Section 5.3 and Appendix E, was approved.
2.4 The gross capital expenditure of £11,577,000 (net capital expenditure of £10,632,000) for 2020/21, comprising the annual PPM programmes for the City Council’s Highways, Public Lighting & Bridges and Structures was approved.
2.5 The Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways delegated to the Executive Director of City Management and Communities the authority to make changes to the programmes agreed in recommendations 2.1 to 2.4, subject to the proviso that the overall budget is not exceeded and that the Cabinet Member is consulted on any significant changes.
3. Reasons for Decision
3.1 All assets deteriorate over time and any work aimed at maintaining the durability of the asset is classed as programmed maintenance. Such work prolongs the life of the asset and/or maintains structural capacity and is therefore considered as capital expenditure.
3.2 Each year the City Council’s regular inspection and testing programmes determine the current condition of the various highway assets (Carriageways, Footways, Lighting and Bridges & Structures) and identifies the forward investment needs that will keep the highway network in a safe and reliable condition.
3.3 Provision has been made in the capital programme for this expenditure to enable these programmes of work to be implemented together with preparation of forward programmes of work for 2021/22.
3.4 The Planned Preventative Maintenance programme set out in this report will ensure that the City Council’s highway assets remain safe and effective and support the City for All agenda.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 06/03/2020
Effective from: 06/03/2020
Decision:
1. That Appendix A to this report be exempt from public disclosure by virtue of paragraph 7 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972 because the applications involve the likely disclosure of exempt information relating to an individual.
2. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the recommendations of the Discretionary Housing Payment Review Advisory Panel meeting held on18 February 2020
Reasons for Decision
The Discretionary Housing Payment Review Advisory Panel has set out the reasons for the recommendations in each case considered by the Panel in the recommendations in Appendix A of the report, which are more fully set out in the case papers submitted to the Panel.
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 06/03/2020
Effective from: 06/03/2020
Decision:
1. That this report and appendices be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972 Schedule 12A, Part 1, Paragraph 3, as amended, in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of an individual.
2. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the recommendations of the Rating Advisory Panel held on 28th January 2020 and determined the applications for National Non-Domestic Rates Discretionary and Hardship relief as set out in Appendix A of the report.
Reasons for Decision
The Rating Advisory Panel has set out the reasons for the recommendations in each case considered by the Panel in the recommendations in Appendix A of the report.
Wards affected: (All Wards);
Lead officer: Susan Bush
Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration
Decision published: 06/03/2020
Effective from: 06/03/2020
Decision:
1. That Appendix A to this report be exempt from public disclosure by virtue of paragraph 7 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972 because the applications involve the likely disclosure of exempt information relating to an individual.
2. That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the recommendations of the Discretionary Housing Payment Review Advisory Panel meeting held on14 January 2020
Reasons for Decision
The Discretionary Housing Payment Review Advisory Panel has set out the reasons for the recommendations in each case considered by the Panel in the recommendations in Appendix A of the report, which are more fully set out in the case papers submitted to the Panel.